LECTURERS' PERFORMANCE IN INCREASING OF LEARNING QUALITY THROUGH SELF-MONITORING EVALUATION

Andi Rahman

Abstract


The research objective was to get the use of teachers’ self-monitoring strategies in conducting performance evaluations, so that the quality of learning in class becomes high quality. The research method used descriptive qualitative. Data collection techniques used observation and interviews. The data analysis technique consists of three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The research was conducted at the Ahmad Dahlan Institute of Technology and Business Jakarta. The results showed that the teacher always evaluated the performance of the learning and teaching process on a regular basis, namely at the end of each semester. This is done to evaluate the overall learning outcomes. Meanwhile, learning evaluation is also carried out after each learning process by students’ input. The implication of the research results is the development of a teacher’s performance evaluation system at the University, either carried out by individual or university leaders

Keywords


Performance, Learning, Self-Monitoring

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alicias, E. R. (2005, May 6). Toward an objective evaluation of teacher performance: The use of variance partitioning analysis, VPA. Education Policy Analysis Archives. Arizona State University. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v13n30.2005

Ariasa Giri, I. M. (2016). SUPERVISI PENDIDIKAN DALAM PENINGKATAN MUTU PENDIDIKAN DI SEKOLAH. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 2(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v2i1.60

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (8 Edition). CA: Cengage Learning.

Atkinson, A., Burgess, S., Croxson, B., Gregg, P., Propper, C., Slater, H., & Wilson, D. (2009). Evaluating the impact of performance-related pay for teachers in England. Labour Economics, 16(3), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2008.10.003

Bacher-Hicks, A., Chin, M. J., Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2019). An experimental evaluation of three teacher quality measures: Value-added, classroom observations, and student surveys. Economics of Education Review, 73, 101919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.101919

Barnett, J. A. (2012). Experienced Teacher Evaluation through Performance Appraisals: Is Consistency Possible? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1853–1860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.137

Cuevas, R., Ntoumanis, N., Fernandez-Bustos, J. G., & Bartholomew, K. (2018). Does teacher evaluation based on student performance predict motivation, well-being, and ill-being? Journal of School Psychology, 68, 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.03.005

Dewi, C. (2018). MANAJEMEN PENGEMBANGAN KOMPETENSI DOSEN. JMSP: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Supervisi Pendidikan, 3(1).

Ghufron, A., & Mubarok, H. (2018). SUPERVISI AKADEMIK SEBAGAI DASAR PENGEMBANGAN PEMBELAJARAN GURU. ELEMENTARY, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v4i2.3000

Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2014). Skills, productivity and the evaluation of teacher performance. Economics of Education Review, 40, 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.03.002

Kuriloff, P., Jordan, W., Sutherland, D., & Ponnock, A. (2019). Teacher preparation and performance in high-needs urban schools: What matters to teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 83, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.001

Lauermann, F., & König, J. (2016). Teachers’ professional competence and wellbeing: Understanding the links between general pedagogical knowledge, self-efficacy and burnout. Learning and Instruction, 45, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2016.06.006

Marey, R., Hesham, G., Magdd, A., & Toprak, M. (2020). Re-conceptualizing teacher evaluation and supervision in the light of educational reforms in Egypt. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100081

Masliah, E. (2019). Pengembangan Model Supervisi Akademik Teknik Mentoring dalam Upaya Peningkatan Mutu Pembelajaran. Indoensian Journal of Educational Management & Administration Review, 3(2).

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis; An Expanded Sourcebook. New Delhi: Sage Publication.

O’Flaherty, J., & Liddy, M. (2018). The impact of development education and education for sustainable development interventions: a synthesis of the research. Environmental Education Research, 24(7), 1031–1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1392484

Rahman, M. H. (2014). Professional Competence , Pedagogical Competence and the Performance of Junior High School of Science Teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(9), 75–80. Retrieved from www.iiste.org

Skovholt, K., Nordenström, E., & Stokoe, E. (2019). Evaluative conduct in teacher–student supervision: When students assess their own performance. Linguistics and Education, 50, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.03.001

Suknaisith, A., Wongwanich, S., & Piromsombat, C. (2014). Development of Teacher Performance in Educational Measurements and Evaluation through Self-monitoring Strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1683–1688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.456

Tyagita, B. P. A., & Iriani, A. (2018). Strategi Peningkatan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Sekolah. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2018.v5.i2.p165-176




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v12i2.303

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Andi Rahman

Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Abstracted/Indexed by:

    

 


 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.