The Effectiveness of Using E-Learning Students The University of Lancang Kuning During Covid-19 Using COBIT 5.0

Nurliana Nasution; Zamzami Zamzami; Fajrizal Fajrizal; Roki Hardianto; Nurul Aien Binti Abd Aziz

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.1758

The Effectiveness of Using E-Learning Students The University of Lancang Kuning During Covid-19 Using COBIT 5.0

Nurliana Nasution, Zamzami Zamzami, Fajrizal Fajrizal, Roki Hardianto, Nurul Aien Binti Abd Aziz

Abstract

During the Covid-19 pandemic, the spread was very wide, including in Indonesia. This affects the student learning system which changes drastically from face-to-face learning to learning at home. The learning solution implemented is online, including for Lancang Kuning University students. The face-to-face learning system applied by Lancang Kuning University changed during the Covid-19 period into distance learning (online) using E-Learning amid the limitations of the existing infrastructure. After implementing the E-Learning system for Lancang Kuning University student lectures, it is necessary to audit academic governance. This audit was conducted to determine the extent to which the implementation of existing information technology was by the academic needs of the Lancang Kuning University community. Evaluation of E-Learning using COBIT 5.0. 4 domains become standards in the COBIT 5.0 assessment, namely Website Content Feasibility Standards, Website Language Feasibility Standards, Website Presentation Feasibility Standards, and Website Component Aspects. In general, the acquisition of the E-Learning index value at Lancang Kuning University has 4 domains, namely Standard indicating good results by showing the total index value is above 3.85. This means that the level of maturity of the Lancang Kuning University student learning system during the Covid 19 period, using E-Learning obtained the predicate "Satisfactory" referring to the predetermined value range method.

Keywords

e-learning, Cobit, Covid-19, Evaluation of Learning, University

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abu-Musa, Ahmad A. 2006. "Evaluating the Security Controls of CAIS in Saudi Organizations : An Empirical Study." Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences 18: 77–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1319-1578(06)80004-2.

Akoka, Jacky, and Isabelle Comyn-Wattiau. 2010. “A Framework for Auditing Web-Based Information Systems.” 18th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2010.

Al-ajlan, Ajlan, and Saudi Arabia. “A Comparative Study of E-Learning Systems in Saudi Arabia Universities A Comparative Study of E-Learning Systems in Saudi Arabia Universities.”

Al-Karaki, Jamal N., Amjad Gawanmeh, and Sanaa El-Yassami. 2020. “GoSafe: On the Practical Characterization of the Overall Security Posture of an Organization Information System Using Smart Auditing and Ranking.” Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences (XXXX). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.09.011.

Alin A. Arens, Randal J. Elder, Mark S. Beasley. 2015. Auditing and Assurance Service. Erlangga.

Brahim, Belgium, and Admane Lotfi. 2020. "A Traces Based System Helping to Assess Knowledge Level in E-Learning System." Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences 32(8): 977–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.10.008.

Basori. 2010. Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Chasis dan Body dengan Model Blended Learning (Perpaduan Antara Traditional Learning dan E-Learning).

Bersin, Josh. 2004. The Blended Learning Book Best Practices, Proven Methodologies, and Lesson Learned. San Francisco: John Weley.

Bielawski, L & Metcalf, D. 2003. Blended E-Learning: Integrating Knowledge, Performance Support, and Online Learning. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.

Catlin R. Tucker. 2012. Blended Learning in Grades 4–12. London: Corwin Press.

Comey. W.L. 2009. Blended Learning and the Classroom Environment: A Comparative Analysis of Students’ Perception of the Classroom Environment across Community College Courses Taught in Traditional Face-to-face, Online and Blended Methods. Disertation. The Faculty of The Graduate School of Education and Human Development of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education.

Gustiarni, I. S. A. P. (200AD). Pengembangan aplikasi e-university : sistem infromasi pengelolaan audit teknologi informasi berbasis risiko menggunakan framework cobit versi 4.1.

Herrenkohl, L.R, Tasker, T, & White, B. 2011. Pedagogical Practices to Support Classroom Cultures of Scientific Inquiry. Routledge Publisher.

Husamah. 2014. Pembelajaran Bauran (Blended Learning). Prestasi Pustaka. Publisher.

Institute, I. G. (2007). Ch4.1 - Cobit 4.1. Governance An International Journal Of Policy And Administration. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4048(97)84675-5

Institute, IT Governance. 2007. Governance An International Journal Of Policy And Administration Ch4.1 - Cobit 4.1. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Framework+Control+Objectives+Management+Guidelines+Maturity+Models#4.

Ittonen, K. I. M. (2010). A Theoretical Examination of the Role of Auditing and the Relevance of Audit Reports. Business Administration, 28, 1–70.

Majid, A. 2014. Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mason Robin & Rennie Frank. 2009. E-Learning Panduan Lengkap Memahami Dunia Digital dan Internet. Edisi Indonesia. Cetakan I, Januari 2010. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baca.

Prihadi Singgih. 2013. Model Blended Learning. Kadipiro Surakarta. Yuma Pressindo.

Rizal, M., & Karawang, U. S. (2016). Framework Audit IT, (December).

Rosenberg. Marc J. 2006. Beyond E-Learning-Approaches and Technologies to Enhance Organizational Knowledge, Learning, and Performance. Amerika: Pteiffer.

R. Poppy Yaniawati. 2010. E-Learning dan Alternatif Pembelajaran Kontemporer. Bandung: Arfino Raya.

Rusman, Kurniawan, D., Riyana, C. 2011. Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Perkasa.

Rusman. 2012. Belajar dan Pembelajarn Berbasis Komputer (Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru Abad 21). Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Saleena, B. 2015. “Using Concept Similarity in Cross Ontology for Adaptive E-Learning Systems.” Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences 27(1): 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2014.03.007.

Srivastava, Bhavana, and Tanwir Uddin Haider. 2020. “Personalized Assessment Model for Alphabets Learning with Learning Objects in E-Learning Environment for Dyslexia.” Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences 32(7): 809–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2017.11.005.

Siahaan, Sudirman. 2007. Seputar Pembelajaran Elektronik (E-Learning), Teknodik. 67-79.

Siemen, G. 2005. Connectivisme: A Learning Theory for Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning (Vol2. No.1).

Simamora, L. 2003. E-Learning: Konsep dan Perkembangan Teknologi yang Mendukungnya. Cakrawala Pendidikan, E-learning dalam Pendidikan. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Smaldino, Sharon. Lowter, Deborah. Russel, James D. 2011. Teknologi Pembelajaran dan Media untuk Belajar. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sugiyono, (2008). Metode Penelitian Kunatitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung Alfabeta.

Supradono, B. 2011. “Tingkat Kematangan Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi (IT Governance) Pada Layanan Dan Dukungan Teknologi Informasi (Kasus : Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Di Kota Semarang)” vol. 11.

Thorne, Kaye. 2003. Blended Learning: How to Integrate Online and Traditional Learning. London: Kogan Page Publishers.

Widayanti, R., & Purnamawati, L. (2013). Audit Sistem Informasi Pada Aplikasi Sistem Manajemen Pemeriksaan (SMP) Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. Forum Ilmiah, 10(2), 262–272.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.1758