Urgency and Adaptation of New Literations in Primary School Education in the Digital Era

Desvian Bandarsyah

Abstract


Teachers have been aware of the urgency of literacy; however, some teachers are still neglected. The main purpose of this paper is to discuss new literacy in the digital era, which includes primary school education. Our primary education is an important actor in preparing Indonesian future generations. The research method used was a literature review to view the diversity of culture and awareness among Indonesian. Data had been collected throughout history recorded in digital, books, and many others. Data were analyzed using comparing the diverse history related to primary education. By comparing data, we make a framework that is used to organize future primary education. The results show that the digital era and literacy are becoming integrated to improve learning and teaching quality. Both teachers and students should be aware a digital literacy should improve the quality of our education. The study's implications will be used to assess how effective literacy education has improved educational quality. 

Keywords


Adaptation, New Literacy, Primary School and Digital Era

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arendt, H. (1993). Asal-usul Totaliterisme, Jilid 1 dan 3. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Canton, J. (2009). The Extreme Future. Tangerang: Pustaka Alfabet.

Capra, F. (2014). Titik Balik Peradaban: Sains, Masyarakat dan Kebangkitan Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Promethea.

Chapman, R., Likhanov, M., Selita, F., Zakharov, I., Smith-Woolley, E., & Kovas, Y. (2019). New literacy challenge for the twenty-first century: genetic knowledge is poor even among well educated. Journal of Community Genetics, 10(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-018-0363-7

Engelmann, S. (2008). Science versus Basic Educational Research. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 32(1), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1030011200025811

Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2016). Exploring the impact of digital technologies on professional responsibilities and education. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115608387

Freire, P., Illich, I., & Fromm, E. (1999). Menggugat Pendidikan Fundamentalis, Konservatif, Liberalis, Anarkis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ghosn-Chelala, M. (2019). Exploring sustainable learning and practice of digital citizenship: Education and place-based challenges. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 14(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197918759155

Hatzigianni, M. (2018). Transforming early childhood experiences with digital technologies. Global Studies of Childhood, 8(2), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610617734987

Kasali, R. (2019). Series on Education: Sentra, Membangun Kecerdasan dan Kemampuan Anak Sejak Usia Dini Demi Masa Depan yang Cemerlang. Jakarta: Mizan.

Kertajaya, H. (2018). Citizen 4.0: Menjejakkan Prinsip-Prinsip dan Pemasaran Humanis di Era Digital. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Koltay, T. (2011). The media and the literacies: media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy. Media, Culture & Society, 33(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710393382

McDougall, J., Readman, M., & Wilkinson, P. (2018). The uses of (digital) literacy. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(3), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1462206

Parekh, B. (2012). Rethinking Multikulturalisme: Keragaman Budaya dan Teori Politik. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Pinker, S. (2019). Enlightenment Now: Membela Nalar, Sains, Humanisme, dan Kemajuan. Manado: CV. Global Indo Kreatif.

Priem, K., & Fendler, L. (2019). Shifting epistemologies for discipline and rigor in educational research: Challenges and opportunities from digital humanities. European Educational Research Journal, 18(5), 610–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118820433

Putra, R. D. (2019). Suaka Suaka Kearifan. Singaraja: Mahima Institut & Tatkala.

Ruan, Q. Y. (2013). A Critical Ontological Approach to Deconstructing the Kaleidoscopic New Literacies in Digital Era. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 411–414, 997–1001. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.411-414.997

Rutten, K., Rodman, G. B., Wright, H. K., & Soetaert, R. (2013). Cultural studies and critical literacies. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(5), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912474544

Smythe, S. (2018). Adult Learning in the Control Society: Digital Era Governance, Literacies of Control, and the Work of Adult Educators. Adult Education Quarterly, 68(3), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713618766645

Soedjatmoko. (1976). Kesadaran Sejarah dan Pembangunan. Prisma, 7(V).

Soedjatmoko. (2010). Menjadi Bangsa Terdidik Menurut Soedjatmoko. Jakarta: Kompas.

Taylor, J. L., Soro, A., & Brereton, M. (2018). New literacy theories for participatory design. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210588

Toynbee, A. (2007). Sejarah Umat Manusia: Uraian Analisis, Kronologis, Naratif, dan Komparatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Tsai, H. Y. S., Shillair, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2017). Social Support and Playing Around: An Examination of How Older Adults Acquire Digital Literacy with Tablet Computers. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 36(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464815609440

Yamin, M., & Syahrir. (2020). Pembangunan Pendidikan Merdeka Belajar (Telaah Metode Pembelajaran). Ejournal.Mandalanursa.Org, 6(1). http://ejournal.mandalanursa.org/index.php/JIME/index

Zed, M. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.1274

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Desvian Bandarsyah

Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Abstracted/Indexed by:

    

 


 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.