Model of Teaching English Speaking Practiced for English Department Students  at IAIN Palopo

Roni La'biran

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.1085

Model of Teaching English Speaking Practiced for English Department Students at IAIN Palopo

Roni La'biran

Abstract

The objectives of the research are to discover models of teaching speaking practiced at IAKN Palopo, students’ perceptions of teaching models, teaching speaking models to students’ speaking achievement.

The researcher employed qualitative methods for the study. The data resources for the research chosen through random sampling lectures at IAIN Palopo. The instruments for the research consist of observations, interviews in analyzing the data, the researcher employed a qualitative method.

The results show that the models of teaching speaking practiced at IAKN Palopo is presentation, practice, production model (PPP) the model divided into three phases as follow: Presentation, refers to new topic and contextualizing, teaching Demonstration (cookies activities), teaching English based on classroom situation. Practice refers to learners practice the structure using accurate reproduction techniques including choral and individual repetition and cue-response drills, students did demonstration based on lecturer’s instruction and Students’ perception toward the model is good, there is positive indicator perception because almost students said, happy, lecturer as a good figure in teaching speaking, simple material.

Keywords

Model of Teaching English Speaking, Illustration, Interaction, and Induction.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Leo, Susanto. (2013). A challenging Book to practice Teaching in English. C.VAndioffset. Yogyakarta.

Jafar Basri Muhammad.(2010) An Ecological Approach to Researching Biliteracy Development of Indonesian Bilingual Children in Australian Social Contexts. Victory University. Australia.

Firaz.A. (2005).A Study on Lecturer Characteristics and their Effects on StudentsAttitudes. Jurnal vol.5.reading matrix

Grasha, Anthony. F. (2002). Teaching with style. San Bernadino. University of Cincinaty.

Mile & Humrman.1991.The components of data Analysis.An Expanded

Sourcebook. London: Sage.

Shi, L. (2009). Chinese-Western “Contact Zone”: Students’ Resistance and Lecturers’ Adaptation to Local Needs. TESL Canada Journal, 27(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v27i1.1035

Susilo, Andi.( 2013). “Academic Controversy Model As an Alternative Strategy for Teaching Speaking At University Level.” Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan Dan Kemasyarakatan 11 (2): 285. https://doi.org/10.21154/cendekia.v11i2.205

Tahir bin z saidna, Atmorwardoyo Haryanto, Dollah Syarifuddin &Rinantanti Yulini. 2017. Multilingual Instructional Model of Pesantren School in Indonesia. Journal of Language Teaching and Research.Vol.8No6.pp. 1210-1216, November 2017.

Vazifedoost, H., Charsetad, P., Akbari, M., & Akbari, J. A. (2013). Studying the effects of negative and positive perceptions of price on price mavenism. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(15), 3986–3991. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.5.4465

Papaja, Katarzyna. (2011). “Analyzing Types of Classroom Interaction in CLIL.” Glottodidactica. An International Journal of Applied Linguistics 38 (April): 43. https://doi.org/10.14746/gl.2011.38.4

Rui, W. Y., & Mi, H. Y. (2013). The Building of User Model of Personalized Learning Teaching System Based on Data Mining. Advanced Materials Research, 756–759, 2047–2050. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.756-759.2047

Myers, J. (2012). The Effects of Lesson Study on Classroom Observations and Perceptions of Lesson Effectiveness. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 12(3), 94–104.

Moore, M G. (1989). “Three Types of Interaction.” American Journal of Distance Education 3 (2): 1–7

Maslyn, J., & Farmer, S. (2005). erceptions of Positive and Negative Organizational Politics: Roles of the Frequency and Distance of Political Behavior. January, 1–26

Lifchez, S. D., & Redett, R. J. (2014). A standardized patient model to teach and assess professionalism and communication skills: The effect of personality type on performance. Journal of Surgical Education, 71(3), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.09.010

Lewis (1996). Model of Teaching. Postgraduates. SAGE. Los Angeles.

Kheruniah EanAde (2013) A Lecturer Personality Competence Contribution To A Student Study Motivation And Discipline To Fiqh Lesson. International Journal of scientific & technology research volume 2, issue 2, FebruaryISSN 2277-8616

Kasim, Usman. (2004). “Classroom Interaction in the English Department Speaking Class at State University of Malang.” Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan 11 (3): 1–12. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/101.

Henze, I., Van Driel, J., & Verloop, N. (2007). The change of science lecturers’ personal knowledge about teaching models and modelling in the context of science education reform. International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), 1819–1846. https://doi.org/Doi 10.1080/09500690601052628

Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching, 3rd Edition (Longman Handbooks for Language Lecturers) (p. 370). http://www.amazon.com/Practice-Language-Teaching-Handbooks-Lecturers/dp/0582403855

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.1085