The Dilemma of Religious Education Model in Indonesia Affecting the Inter-Group Attitudes: An Online Survey

Sulaiman Girivirya

Abstract


Legally, Indonesia adheres to religious education preferences with a mono-religious model. Ideally, every institutionally registered religious believer in Indonesia has the right to get religious education according to their respective religions. This is also in accordance with international human rights law.  The method used for data collection in this study was virtual -questionnaire. The questions on the questionnaire begin with the choice questions and are followed by open-ended questions.  This study found that not all religious people get religious education by their religion. From the results of this study, some respondents had experienced following religious education by their faith, viewed other groups negatively, and were disturbed by the activities of other religious groups. However, in general, this study showed that those in diverse religious groups did not have difficulty in inter-group contact efforts.

Keywords


Indonesia Religious Education Model, Inter-Group Attitudes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abanes, M. S., Scheepers, P. L. H., & Sterkens, C. (2014). Ethno-Religious Groups, Identification, Trust and Social Distance in the Ethno-Religiously Stratified Philippines. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 37, 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2014.02.001

Arifin, S. (2010). Attitudes to Human Rights and Freedom of Religion or Belief in Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Bayefsky, A., & Waldman, A. (2010). State Support for Religious Education. State Support for Religious Education. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004149809.i-1117

Dawkins, C. J. (2008). Reflections on Diversity and Social Capital: A Critique of Robert D. Putnam’s ‘E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Housing Policy Debate, 19(1), 208–17.

Fautanu, I., Buhori, M., & Heri Gunawan, H. (2020). Politik Identitas Dalam Pilkada DKI Jakarta Tahun 2017: Perspektif Pemikiran Politik Nurcholish Madjid. Politicon, 2(2), 87–112.

Franken, L., & Bertram-Troost, G. (2021). Passive freedom of education: Educational choice in flanders and the netherlands. Religions, 13(1), 1-21.

Hadi, S. (2015). Metodologi Riset. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset.

Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2018). MeToo and the Promise and Pitfalls of Challenging Rape Culture through Digital Feminist Activism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(2), 236–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506818765318

Ministry of Religious Affairs of Republic Indonesia. (2018). Statistics of Religious People in Indonesia. Retrieved from: https://data.kemenag.go.id/agamadashboard/statistik/umat#

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 55 Tahun 2007 Tentang Pendidikan Agama dan Pendidikan Keagamaan.

Pettigrew, T. F. (2015). Generalized Intergroup Contact Effects on Prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173–85.

Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751

Puron-Cid, G., Santamaria, J. J. S., Siordia, O. S., & Moctezuma, D. (2015, May). Using social media as a tool for assessing citizens perception of regional development dimensions for policy making. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 338-339). https://doi.org/10.1145/2757401.2757463

Sulaiman, S., Imran, A., Hidayat, B. A., Mashuri, S., Reslawati, R., & Fakhrurrazi, F. (2022). Moderation religion in the era society 5.0 and multicultural society: Studies based on legal, religious, and social reviews. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6, 180-193. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v6nS5.2106

Stewart, B. (2016). The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication.

Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., & Roy, R. (2009). The Relationships between Contact, Status, and Prejudice: An Integrated Threat Theory Analysis of Hindu-Muslim Relations in India. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 19(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.984

Yusuf, M. (2020). Why Indonesia Prefers a Mono-Religious Education Model? A Durkheimian Perspective. Al-Albab, 9(1), 37–54.

Yusuf, M. & Sterkens, C. (2015). Analysing the State’s Laws on Religious Education in Post-New Order Indonesia. Al-Jami’ah, 53(1): 105–30. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2015.531.105-130.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.2178

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Sulaiman Girivirya

Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Abstracted/Indexed by:

    

 


 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.