A Holistic and Data-Informed Model of Positive Education, Psychological Well-Being, and Academic Achievement among Generation Z Students

Diki Arisandi, Seri Hartati

Abstract


Recent discussions in higher education increasingly emphasize the need to balance academic achievement with students’ psychological well-being, particularly among Generation Z students who often experience high academic pressure alongside psychosocial challenges. This study examines a holistic model integrating Positive Education and Psychological Well-Being to explain academic achievement among Generation Z students in Muhammadiyah and ‘Aisyiyah higher education institutions in Riau Province. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected from 359 students using validated instruments measuring Positive Education (PERMA), Psychological Well-Being, and Academic Achievement. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, mediation analysis with bootstrapping, and machine learning models (Random Forest and XGBoost) to identify predictive patterns. Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 30 students were used to enrich the interpretation of the quantitative findings. The results indicate significant positive relationships between Positive Education and Psychological Well-Being (r = .52, p < .01) and between Psychological Well-Being and Academic Achievement (r = .55, p < .01). Mediation analysis shows that Psychological Well-Being fully mediates the relationship between Positive Education and Academic Achievement (β = .31, p < .01). Machine learning results further support these findings, with XGBoost demonstrating the highest predictive performance (R² = 0.66) and identifying purpose in life, engagement, and meaning as the most influential predictors of academic achievement. These findings suggest that academic achievement among Generation Z students is closely linked to both the quality of educational environments and students’ psychological resources. Integrating well-being-oriented educational practices with data-informed analytical approaches may provide a promising pathway for supporting sustainable student success in higher education.

Keywords


positive education; psychological well-being; academic achievement; generation Z students; machine learning

References


Abdul Rahman, H., Kwicklis, M., Ottom, M., Amornsriwatanakul, A., H. Abdul-Mumin, K., Rosenberg, M., & Dinov, I. D. (2023). Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Mental Well-Being Using Health Behavior Data from University Students. Bioengineering, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10050575

Allison, L., Waters, L., & Kern, M. L. (2021). Flourishing Classrooms: Applying a Systems-Informed Approach to Positive Education. Contemporary School Psychology, 25(4), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-019-00267-8

Bakker, A. B., & Mostert, K. (2024). Study Demands–Resources Theory: Understanding Student Well-Being in Higher Education. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 36, Number 3). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09940-8

Blasco-Belled, A., & Alsinet, C. (2022). The architecture of psychological well-being: A network analysis study of the Ryff Psychological Well-Being Scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 63(3), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12795

Blömeke, S., Jentsch, A., Ross, N., Kaiser, G., & König, J. (2022). Opening up the black box: Teacher competence, instructional quality, and students’ learning progress. Learning and Instruction, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101600

Bustamante-Mora, A., Diéguez-Rebolledo, M., Zegarra, M., Escobar, F., & Epuyao, G. (2025). Environmental Conditions and Their Impact on Student Concentration and Learning in University Environments: A Case Study of Education for Sustainability. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 17, Number 3). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031071

Chardonnens, S. (2025). Adapting educational practices for Generation Z: integrating metacognitive strategies and artificial intelligence. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 10). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1504726

Chaudhry, S., Tandon, A., Shinde, S., & Bhattacharya, A. (2024). Student psychological well-being in higher education: The role of internal team environment, institutional, friends and family support and academic engagement. PLoS ONE, 19(1 January). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297508

Chue, K. L., Yeo, A., Nie, Y., & Chew, L. C. (2024). Modifying the PERMA profiler to assess student well-being. Current Psychology, 43(4), 3749–3760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04550-z

Cilar Budler, L. (2025). Well-Being Unveiled: A Concept Analysis of Mental, Psychological, and Subjective Well-Being. Health Science Reports, 8(9). https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.71149

Frazier, T., & Doyle Fosco, S. L. (2023). Nurturing positive mental health and wellbeing in educational settings – the PRICES model. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1287532

Gill, A., Trask-Kerr, K., & Vella-Brodrick, D. (2021). Systematic Review of Adolescent Conceptions of Success: Implications for Wellbeing and Positive Education. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 33, Number 4, pp. 1553–1582). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09605-w

Kern, M. L., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2021). The Palgrave Handbook of Positive Education.

Mat Roni, S., & Djajadikerta, H. G. (2021). Assess the Quality of Your Instrument. In S. Mat Roni & H. G. Djajadikerta (Eds.), Data Analysis with SPSS for Survey-based Research (pp. 69–88). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0193-4_5

Ningthoujam, S., Singh, T., Gautam, V., & Zafar, M. (2021). Perceived Stress and Coping Mechanism of Generation Z Management Students: Empirical Evidence Perceived Stress and Coping Mechanism of Generation Z Management Students: Empirical Evidence.

Rodríguez, S., González-Suárez, R., Vieites, T., Piñeiro, I., & Díaz-Freire, F. M. (2022). Self-Regulation and Students Well-Being: A Systematic Review 2010–2020. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 14, Number 4). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042346

Sarzhanova, G., & Nurgabdeshov, A. (2025). Mapping psychological well-being in education: A systematic review of key dimensions and an integrative conceptual framework. In Journal of Pedagogical Research (Vol. 9, Number 3, pp. 327–349). Duzce University, Faculty of Education. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202534832

Turetsky, K. M., Sinclair, S., Starck, J. G., & Shelton, J. N. (2021). Beyond students: how teacher psychology shapes educational inequality. In Trends in Cognitive Sciences (Vol. 25, Number 8, pp. 697–709). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.04.006

Wang, F., & Liu, Y. (2022). Mediating Role of Resilience in the Relationship Between English Learners’ Motivation and Well-Being. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915456

Wang, R., & Zhang, H. (2025). Integrating positive psychology principles in vocational education: A new approach to boosting student well-being and academic motivation. Acta Psychologica, 254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104834

Yu, C. H., Xiao, Z., & Hanson, J. (2024). Machine learning for analyzing the relationship between well-being and academic performance with large-scale assessment data. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Machine learning in educational sciences: Approaches, applications and advances (pp. 267–292). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9379-6_13




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i2.9584

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Diki Arisandi, Seri Hartati

Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Abstracted/Indexed by:

    

 


 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.