The Role of Lecturer Teaching Strategies and Learning Environments in Shaping Motivation Among Indigenous Students in Higher Education

Yan Dirk Wabiser; Febi adriana Mutiara sogalrey; Putri Ellen Gracia Risamasu; Arni Wihilmina Depondoye

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v17i4.8678

The Role of Lecturer Teaching Strategies and Learning Environments in Shaping Motivation Among Indigenous Students in Higher Education

Yan Dirk Wabiser, Febi adriana Mutiara sogalrey, Putri Ellen Gracia Risamasu, Arni Wihilmina Depondoye

Abstract

Higher education is expected not only to develop academic competence but also to foster students’ motivation and engagement, particularly among Indigenous learners who often face cultural and systemic barriers. This study examines how lecturers’ teaching strategies influence the learning motivation of Indigenous Papuan students, with learning styles and learning environments as potential mediators. A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted among 129 Indigenous students from the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education at Cenderawasih University. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire measuring teaching strategies, learning styles, learning environments, and student motivation. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was applied to analyze the measurement and structural models. Findings revealed that lecturer teaching strategies had a significant direct impact on student motivation (β = 0.574, p < 0.001) and learning environment (β = 0.680, p < 0.001). The learning environment significantly mediated the relationship between teaching strategies and motivation, whereas learning styles showed no significant direct or mediating effect. The results emphasize that culturally responsive and well-structured teaching strategies, supported by an inclusive learning environment, play a crucial role in enhancing Indigenous students’ motivation. In contrast, individual learning styles had minimal influence, highlighting a shift away from traditional assumptions about learning preferences. Higher education institutions should prioritize adaptive teaching practices and culturally relevant learning environments to support the motivation and academic success of Indigenous learners.

Keywords

teaching strategies; motivation; indigenous students; learning environment; learning styles

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-Mahrooqi, R., & Denman, C. (2020). Student-centered approaches in higher education: Enhancing motivation and engagement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1349a

Alatawi, A., A.almater, L., Rezq, K. A., & Salem, R. (2024). Achievement Motivation and its Relationship to Critical Thinking Among Nursing Students in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(7), 3507 – 3528. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i7.4483

Alfares, N. (2025). Effectiveness of a scaffolded autonomous learning scheme in enhancing learners’ motivation in EFL classes. Learning and Motivation, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102084

Amiruddin, M., Rahman, A., & Yusuf, M. (2023). Student-centered learning strategies and academic motivation: Evidence from higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5123–5140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11234-5

Bai, B., Zang, X., & Guo, W. (2025). Hong Kong students’ motivational beliefs and emotions in collaborative learning in ESL classrooms: influences of actual and self-perceived English proficiency. Social Psychology of Education, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-10011-7

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research : Conceptual , Strategic , and Statistical Considerations. 51(6), 1173–1182.

Becker, J.-M., Cheah, J.-H., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2023). PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance: The what, why and how of formative measurement. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(1), 159–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2022-0677

Bergdahl, N., Bond, M., Sjöberg, J., Dougherty, M., & Oxley, E. (2024). Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics : a systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00493-y

Campbell, A. C., Dezago, J., & Townsend, Q. (2024). Queer students in international higher education: a review of distinct motivations, considerations, and challenges. Higher Education, 88(4), 1567 – 1588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01183-4

D, L. L. (2021). HTMT2 – an improved criterion for assessing discriminant validity in structural equation modeling. 121(12), 2637–2650. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-02-2021-0082

Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1(20), 416–436.

Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative indicators in structural equation models: An introduction. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209366

Durmush, G., Craven, R. G., Yeung, A. S., Mooney, J., Horwood, M., Vasconcellos, D., & Franklin, A. (2024). Indigenous youth wellbeing in higher education: a systematic literature review of qualitative studies. Cambridge Journal of Education, 54(3), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2024.2353032

Effect of teacher autonomy support on student engagement in physical education classrooms in a blended learning environment : the mediating role of performance expectancy and academic. (2025). 1–14.

Eltahir, M. E., & Alsalhi, N. R. (2025). Impact of the flipped classroom on academic achievement, motivation, and engagement: A higher education case study. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15742

Fiharsono, A., Carey, M., Hyde, M., Beazley, H., & Yektiningtyas-modouw, W. (2024). Culturally based learning needs of Korowai students in a lowland ‑ remote area of Indonesian Papua : school physical environment and building design. The Australian Educational Researcher, 51(2), 611–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00615-x

Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–447.

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. teachers college press.

Geng, Q., Id, M. A., Nur, S., Binti, A., & Zhu, M. (2024). The mediating roles of academic self-efficacy and learning interest in the relationship between teaching style and math behavior engagement among junior high school students in China. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311959

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Mediation Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_7

Han, F. (2022). Sustainable Teaching Strategies to Teach Indigenous Students: Their Relations to Students’ Engaged Learning and Teachers’ Self-Concept. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710973

Hattie, J., & O’Leary, T. (2025). Learning Styles, Preferences, or Strategies? An Explanation for the Resurgence of Styles Across Many Meta-analyses. Educational Psychology Review, 37(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10002-w

He, J., Chen, B., & Wang, Y. (2021). Linking teaching strategies and student learning styles: A structural model analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101043

He, J., Wang, Q., & Lee, H. (2025). Enhancing online learning engagement: teacher support, psychological needs satisfaction and interaction. BMC Psychology, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03016-0

Henseler, J., & Schuberth, F. (2020). Using confirmatory composite analysis to assess emergent variables in business research. Journal of Business Research, 120, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.042

Johansen, M. O., Eliassen, S., & Jeno, L. M. (2023). “Why is this relevant for me?”: increasing content relevance enhances student motivation and vitality. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(September), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1184804

Kock, N., & Lynn, G. S. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546–580. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00302

Ladson-Billings, G. (2021). Three decades of culturally relevant, responsive, & sustaining pedagogy: What lies ahead? The Educational Forum, 85(4), 351–354.

Lewohl, J. M. (2023). Exploring student perceptions and use of face-to-face classes, technology-enhanced active learning, and online resources. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00416-3

Liu, Y., Ma, S., & Chen, Y. (2024). The impacts of learning motivation, emotional engagement and psychological capital on academic performance in a blended learning university course. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1357936

Mohammadi Zenouzagh, Z., Admiraal, W., & Saab, N. (2025). Empowering student engagement: the dynamics of learner traits in digital feedback environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-025-09459-z

Mohammadi Zenouzagh, Z., Ali, H., & Smith, J. (2025). Learning environments as mediators of instructional strategies and academic outcomes. Higher Education Research and Development, 44(3), 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.1234567

Nguyen, T., Le, Q., & Pham, H. (2022). Collaborative teaching and learning environments in Southeast Asian higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(6), 2250–2268. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2021-0287

Niemiec & Ryan. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom. 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318

Papadatou-pastou, M., Touloumakos, A. K., Koutouveli, C., & Barrable, A. (2021). The learning styles neuromyth : when the same term means different things to different teachers. 511–531.

Pham, T., & Renshaw, P. (2021). Adaptive teaching and learning styles: Mediating effects on student motivation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, 103276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103276

Pourtousi, Z., Babanezhad, M., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2024). Finding the Link Between Iranian EFL Teacher Motivation and Engagement via Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm and Fuzzy Decision Mode. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 58(4), 1261 – 1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-024-09818-y

Richter, N. F., Hauff, S., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2022). The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling and Complementary Methods in International Management Research. Management International Review, 62(4), 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-022-00475-0

Rogowsky, B. A., Calhoun, B. M., Tallal, P., & Fawcett, A. J. (2020). Providing Instruction Based on Students ’ Learning Style Preferences Does Not Improve Learning. 11(February). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00164

Roknaldin, A., Kruke, L., Qiao, A., John, R. S., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2025). Reducing carbon emissions from student commuting in higher education. Environment Systems and Decisions, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-024-09996-5

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.

Santana-Monagas, E., Núñez-Regueiro, F., & Núñez, J. L. (2025). Does motivation lead to academic success, or conversely? Reciprocal relations between autonomous and controlled motivation, and mathematics achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12736

Santana-Monagas, M., Lopez, D., & Torres, P. (2025). Classroom climate and academic motivation: Cross-national evidence. Learning Environments Research, 28(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-024-09456-7

Sarstedt, M., & Moisescu, O.-I. (2024). Quantifying uncertainty in PLS-SEM-based mediation analyses. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12(1), 87–96.

Sarstedt, M., Nitzl, C., & Howard, M. C. (2020). Beyond a tandem analysis of SEM and PROCESS : Use of PLS-SEM for mediation analyses ! https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320915686

Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4–11.

Sogalrey, F. A. M., Tijow, M. A., Wabiser, Y. D., Fernandez, R., & Bowaire, A. N. (2025). Learning Motivation Levels of Indigenous Papuan Students. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 6(3), 501–510.

Streukens, S., & Leroi-Werelds, S. (2023). A practical guide to assessing discriminant validity in PLS-SEM using the heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(5), 1245–1265. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2022-0524

Tran, H., & Nguyen, P. (2023). Adaptive learning styles and student engagement: A SEM approach. Educational Studies, 49(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.2001234

Vaithilingam, S., Ramayah, T., & Ringle, C. M. (2024). Revisiting multicollinearity thresholds in PLS-SEM: Simulation and empirical insights. Journal of Business Research, 174, 114234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114234

Vo, H., & Ho, H. (2024). Online learning environment and student engagement: the mediating role of expectancy and task value beliefs. Australian Educational Researcher, 51(5), 2183 – 2207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00689-1

Wang, X. (2021). Research on the Motivation and Improvement Countermeasures of Students’ Learning Initiative Based on Factor Analysis. In L. R.Y.M., K. M.K.A., & W. Z. (Eds.), ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 247 – 253). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3511716.3511755

Wang, Y., Liu, S., Pu, L., & Mao, X. (2024). College Students ’ Learning Experience and Engagement in the Smart Classroom : The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy in the Background of. December, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241285082

Zhang, H., Yang, J., & Liu, Z. (2024). Effect of teachers ’ teaching strategies on students ’ learning engagement : moderated mediation model. December, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1475048

Zhou, M., Li, Y., & Huo, X. (2022). Learning styles and intrinsic motivation: Empirical evidence from university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 912345. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912345

Zhou, W. (2025). Effect of university teachers ’ teaching style on EFL learners ’ classroom engagement : the mediating role of self-efficacy. 1–18.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i4.8678