Analyzing Gender and Educational Differences in Mate Selection Preferences Among Indonesian Early Adults

Mira Ariyani; Lussy Dwiutami Wahyuni; Vanessa Maria Hamjay

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v17i4.8360

Analyzing Gender and Educational Differences in Mate Selection Preferences Among Indonesian Early Adults

Mira Ariyani, Lussy Dwiutami Wahyuni, Vanessa Maria Hamjay

Abstract

Mate selection is a key developmental task during early adulthood, shaped by sociocultural and individual factors. This study investigates how gender and educational background influence mate selection preferences among Indonesian early adults, a topic that remains underexplored in local contexts. A quantitative comparative approach was used, involving 300 unmarried Indonesian individuals aged 20–40, all of whom had at least a diploma (D3) or higher education. Data were collected using an adapted version of the Mate Preferences Questionnaire developed by Buss and Barnes. Non-parametric analyses (Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests) were employed due to non-normal data distribution. Significant differences were found in mate selection preferences based on gender and education level. Men prioritized physical attractiveness, household management ability, and intelligence, while women favored financial stability, religiosity, and higher education. Educational background also influenced preferences: respondents with master’s degrees (S2) placed greater emphasis on religiosity and family background, while those with diploma/bachelor’s degrees (D3/S1) favored sociability and physical attractiveness. Interaction effects between gender and education showed additional variation across multiple criteria including income, intelligence, and household roles. These findings highlight how mate preferences among Indonesian early adults are shaped by both gender norms and educational attainment, reflecting the intersection of traditional cultural values with emerging social trends. The study underscores the importance of considering local sociocultural context in understanding mate selection dynamics and recommends culturally sensitive premarital education programs.

Keywords

mate selection preferences; early adulthood; gender differences; Mann–Whitney; Kruskal–Wallis

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aini, N., Utomo, A., & McDonald, P. (2019). Interreligious Marriage in Indonesia. Journal of Religion and Demography, 6(1), 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1163/2589742X-00601005

Ariyani, M., Wahyuni, L. D., Putri, F. R., & Izzati, A. Z. (2022). Offline and Online Mate Selection Preferences for Indonesians: An Initial Study. The International Conference on Current Advancement in Psychology (ICCAP) 2022 - Psychology for Sustainable Recovery in the Life after the Pandemic, 47–50.

Arnett, J. J. (2014). Emerging Adulthood: The Winding Road from the Late Teens Through the Twenties. In Child Development Perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford Academic.

Bukhari, N. (2023). Social-Cultural Stigmas and Encounters Faced by “Still Unmarried” Women and Their Families. Journal of World Research, 3(2), 1–8. https://jwr.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jwr/article/view/4

Buss, D. M. (1985). Human mate selection. American Scientist, 73(1), 47–51.

Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 559–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559

Byrne, D. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm. Academic Press.

Daraz, U., Khan, Y., Alnajdawi, A. M., & Alsawalqa, R. O. (2023). Empowering Hearts and Shaping Destinies: Unveiling The Profound Influence of Education on Women’s Mate Selection in Pakistan – A Comprehensive Mixed-methods Study. Frontiers in Sociology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1273297

DeGenova, M. K., & Rice, P. F. (2008). Intimate Relationships, Marriages, and Families The 7th Edition. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.

Eastwick, P. W., Luchies, L. B., Finkel, E. J., & Hunt, L. L. (2014). The Predictive Validity of Ideal Partner Preferences: A Review and Meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 623–665. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032432

FEB UI. (2021). Social Norms and Women’s Economic Participation in Indonesia. Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia; Investing in Women; Prospera. https://feb.ui.ac.id/en/2021/11/08/social-norms-and-womens-economic-participation-in-indonesia/

Government of Indonesia. (2019). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.

Harahap, N. H. P. (2022, May 1). Perempuan dan Budaya Patriarki. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, Saintek, Sosial Dan Hukum (PSSH). https://jurnal.semnaspssh.com/index.php/pssh

Larasati, D. (2012). Perbedaan Preferensi Pemilihan Pasangan Hidup pada Wanita Dewasa Muda yang Bekerja dan Tidak Bekerja. Universitas Indonesia.

Levinson, D. J. (1978). The Seasons of a man’s life. Ballantine Books, Knopf.

National Population and Family Planning Board (BKKBN). (2023, November 11). Penyuluhan PUP (Pendewasaan Usia Perkawinan). https://kampungkb.bkkbn.go.id/kampung/38913/intervensi/657021/penyuluhan-pup-pendewasaan-usia-perkawinan

Rangkuti, A. A., & Fajrin, D. O. (2015). Preferensi Pemilihan Calon Pasangan Hidup Ditinjau dari Keterlibatan Ayah pada Anak Perempuan. JPPP - Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengukuran Psikologi, 4(2), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPPP.042.03

Santrock, J. W. (2020). A topical approach to lifespan development (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Schmitt, D. P. (2014). On the proper functions of human mate preference adaptations: Comment on Eastwick, Luchies, Finkel, and Hunt (2014). Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 666–672. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036225

Setyonaluri, D., Maghfirah, A., & Aryaputra, C. (2020). Norms in Transition? The Relationship between Education and Singlehood. Jurnal Studi Pemuda, 9(2), 136. https://doi.org/10.22146/studipemudaugm.57995

Sprecher, S., Econie, A., & Treger, S. (2019). Mate Preferences in Emerging Adulthood and Beyond: Age variations in Mate Preferences and Beliefs about Change in Mate Preferences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(10), 3139–3158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518816880

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. PT Alfabeta.

Syafe’i, I. (2015). Subordinasi Perempuan Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Rumah Tangga. Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsk.v15i1.716

Todosijević, B., Ljubinković, S., & Arančić, A. (2003). Mate Selection Criteria: A Trait Desirability Assessment Study of Sex Differences in Serbia. Evolutionary Psychology, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490300100108

Townsend, T. U. (1989). A Method for Estimating the Long-Term Performance of Direct-Coupled Photovoltaic Systems. University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Wijaya, Z. C., Mantovani, A. N., Kencana, K. P., & Sepsita, V. (2024). Quarterlife Crisis in Young Adults: Challenges, Impacts, and Adaptation Processes. Jurnal Psikologi Terapan (JPT), 7(1). https://doi.org/10.29103/jpt.v7i1.14527

Wisnuwardhani, D., & Mashoedi, S. F. (2012). Hubungan Interpersonal. Salemba Humanika.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i4.8360