Examining the Necessity of Reflective Module: Literacy Numeracy Skill of Students Elementary School

Yeni Rakhmawati, Ali Mustadi

Abstract


The research aims to describe the need for reflective modules in building literacy skills of primary school students. The research used a quantitative descriptive method. The population was the fifth-grade primary school students that implement the 2013 curriculum with A accreditation—the data collection technique used non-test with observation instruments, questionnaires, interview guidelines, and literature review. The sample was taken using a purposive random sampling technique. The sample in this study was 126 students. The results showed that students and teachers need a reflective module to build numeracy literacy. The reflective module has the potential to build numeracy literacy skills. Literacy skill is closely related to reflective thinking processes, in which reflective thinking is a critical thinking process for making an assessment. Self-assessment aims to measure the extent of an individual's abilities to encourage the individual to develop self-potential.


Keywords


Module, Reflective Module, Literacy, Literacy Numeracy, Primary School

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abidin, Y., Mulyati, T., & Yunansah, H. (2017). Pembelajaran literasi: strategi untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi matematika, sains, membaca and menulis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Ananda, Rusydi & Fadhli Muhammad. (2018). Statistik pendidikan (Teori dan praktik dalam pendidikan. Medan: Widya Puspita

Ashwin, P., Boud, D., Coate, K., Hallett, F., Keane, E., Krause, K-L., Leibowitz, B., MacLaren, I., McArthur, J., McCune, V., & Tooher, M. (2015). Reflective teaching in higher education. London: Paul Ashwin and Bloomsbury.

Beers, C. S., Beers, J. W, & Smith. J. O. (2010). Literacy Instruction. New York London: THE GUI LFORD PRESS

Craig, Jeffrey, and Lynette Guzmán. (2018). Six propositions of a social theory of numeracy: interpreting an influential theory of literacy. Numeracy 11, Iss. 2 (2018): Article 2.https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.11.2.2

Hartley, Robyn & Horne, Jackie. (2006). Researching literacy and numeracy costs and benefits: what is possible. Literacy & Numeracy Studies, 15 (1), 2006

Hong, Yi-Chun & Choi, Ikseon. (2011). Three dimensions of reflective thinking in solving design problems: a conceptual model. Education Tech Research Dev. Vol 59: 687-710. DOI 10.1007/s11423-011-9202-9

İncikabıa, Lütfi , Ayanoğlub, Perihan , Uysal, Ramazan. (2020). Sixth-Grade Students’ Procedural and Conceptual Understandings of Division Operation in a Real-Life Context. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education September 2020, Volume 13, Issue 1, 127-138. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2020.171

Indonesia National Assessment Programme. (2020, September 15). Retrieved From Pusmenjar Kemendikbud Indonesia. Protection Agency website: https://pusmenjar.kemdikbud.go.id/inap-sd/

Kemendikbud. (2017). Materi pendukung literasi numerasi. Jakarta: Tim GLN Kemendikbud

Kemendikbud. (2017). Peta jalan gerakan literasi nasional. Jakarta: Tim GLN Kemendikbud

Kementrian Pendidikan and Kebudayaan. (2016). Indonesian National Assesment Programme. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan

Lickona, T. (2013). Pendidikan karakter : Panduan lengkap mendidik siswa menjadi pintar and baik. (Terjemahan Lita S) Bandung: Penerbit Nusa Media . (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 2008)

Matanluk, O., Mohammad, B., Norizah, D., Kiflee, A., & Imbug, M. (2013). The Effectiveness of Using Teaching Module Based on Radical Constructivism toward Students Learning Process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90(InCULT2012), 607–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.132

Musliman, R., Rahayah, S., & Din, R. (2013). Assessing students’ spatial intelligence for literacy and numeracy skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences ,695–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.142

Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. (2013). Sastra anak: Pengantar pemahaman dunia anak. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press

OECD. (2018). “Programme for international student assessment (PISA) Result from PISA 2018” www.oecd.org.edu/pisa

Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy : are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use ? Journal of Mathematics Education. Vol 4, No. 1, p 89-100, 2011

Ooa, Tun Zaw, Habók, Anita. (2020). The Development of a Reflective Teaching Model for Reading Comprehension in English Language Teaching. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education September 2020, Volume 13, Issue 1, 127-138. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2020.171

Pacheco, Q. A. (2005). Reflective teaching and its impact on foreign language teaching. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 5(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v5i3.9166

Paterson, C., & Chapman, J. A. (2013). Enhancing skills of critical reflection to evidence learning in professional practice. Physical Therapy in Sport: Official Journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine, 14(3), 133– 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2013.03.004

PISA. (2012). Assesment and analytical framework: mathematics, raeding, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publisher, 2013, p 65–76.

Prastowo. (2015). Panduan kreatif membuat bahan ajar inovatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2012.

Kusrieni, Devi. (2014). Confidence relationship with cheating behavior. Psychopedia Journal: 2014. vol.3, no.2, p. 100-111

Sadewi, AI, Sugiharto, DYP., & Nusantoro, E. (2012). Increase confidence in mathematics lessons through symbolic modeling techniques content assignment services. Jurnal Indonesian Journal of Guidance and Counseling: Theory and Application, vol 1, no. 2, p. 8-12

Tahmidaten, Lilik & Krismanto, Wawan. (2020). Permasalahan Budaya Membaca di Indonesia (Studi Pustaka Tentang Problematika & Solusinya). Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Vol. 10 No. 1, Januari 2020: 22-33

Ortlieb, Evan. T. (2010) Beyond Just Books: Sparking Children’s Interest in Reading. International Journal of Education, 2010, Vol. 2, No. 2: E9

Triatma, Nur Ilham. (2016). Minat baca pada kelas VI Sekolah Dasar Negeri Delegan 2 Prambanan Sleman Yogyakarta. E-Jurnal Prodi Teknologi Pendidikan. Vol. (5). No. 6, hal. 172-173.

Musliman, R., Rahayah, S., & Din, R. (2013). Assessing students' spatial intelligence for literacy and numeracy skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 695–701. https://doi.org/10.-1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.142

Kharizmi, Muhammad. (2015). Kesulitan siswa sekolah dasar dalam meningkatkan kemampuan literasi. JUPENDAS, ISSN 2355-3650, Vol. 2, No. 2, September 2015

Ramandanu, Febriana. (2019). Gerakan literasi sekolah (GLS) melalui pemanfaatan sudut baca kelas sebagai sarana alternatif penumbuhan minat baca siswa. Jurnal Mimbar Ilmu, Vol. 24 No. 1, 2019

Pradana, Fransiska Ayuka Putri. (2020). Pengaruh budya literasi sekolah melalui pemanfaatan sudut baca terhadap minat membaca siswa di sekolah dasar. JURNAL Pendidikan dan Konseling, Volume 2 No 1 Tahun 2020 Halaman 81-85

Gilang,L., Sihombing, R.M., dan Sari, N. (2017). Kesesuaian konteks dan ilustrasi pada buku bergambar untuk mendidik karakter anak usia dini. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, Tahun VII, Nomor 2, Oktober 2017

Programme for international student assessment (PISA) Results from PISA 2015". Retrieved from OECD 2015. Protection Agency website: www.oecd.org.edu/pisa

Purpura, D. J., Hume, L. E., Sims, D. M., & Lonigan, C. J. (2011). Journal of Experimental Child Early literacy and early numeracy : The value of including early literacy skills in the prediction of numeracy development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(4), 647–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.07.004

Rakhmawati, Y., & Mustadi, A. (2019). Self-efficacy in Primary Schools Students as Potential Characters: From the Perspective of Students’ Self-ability and Interest. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 55-67. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i1.15221.

Reed, P. A. (2001). Learning style and laboratory preference: A study of middle school technology education teachers in Virginia. Journal of technology education, Vol. 13, No 1: 59-70

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories, and Educational Perspective (6th ed.). Boston, MA Pearson Education Inc.

Sejpal, DR. Kandarp. (2013). Modular Method of teaching Principal. International Journal for Research in Education Vol. 2, Issue:2, February 2013 (IJRE) ISSN:2320-091X

Smith, J. (2013). Reflective practice. Dalam Anne D. Cockburn & Graham Haandscomb (Eds). Teaching children 3-11: a student’s guide (3rd ed). London: SAGE Publications Ltd

Stecey, K & Tuner, R. (2015). Assessing mathematical literacy. The PISA experience, Australia: Springer, 2015

Suharna, H. a. (2013). Berpikir reflektif mahasiswa dalam menyelesaiakan masalah matematika. KNPM V Himpunan Matematika Indonesia, 280-290.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tariah, D.C Inko. (2014). Assessment of Literacy and Numeracy Levels of Junior Secondary School Students in the Rivers State of Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online), Vol.5, No.19, 2014

Winkel. (2009). Psikologi pengajaran. Yogyakarta: Media Abadi.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i1.534

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Yeni Rakhmawati

Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Abstracted/Indexed by:

    

 


 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.