Metacognitive Regulation Strategies Among Indonesian Undergraduate Students During Conic Sections Conceptualization
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
An, Y.-J., & Cao, L. (2014). Examining the Effects of Metacognitive Scaffolding on Students’ Design Problem Solving and Metacognitive Skills in an Online Environment. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 10(4), 552–568. Retrieved from http://proxy.lib.odu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=100728963&site=eds-live&scope=site
Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2007). Predators of knowledge construction: Interpreting students’ metacognition in an amusement park physics program. Science Education, 91(2), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20176
Bakar, M. A. A., & Ismail, N. (2019). Merging of metacognitive regulation strategies and activity based learning through best seller mathematical learning activities to enhance student’s mastery of mathematics. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9A), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071618
Bellon, E., Fias, W., & Smedt, B. De. (2021). Too Anxious to Be Confident? A Panel Longitudinal Study Into the Interplay of Mathematics Anxiety and Metacognitive Monitoring in Arithmetic Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(8), 1550–1564. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000704
Cosar, M. Ç., & Kesan, C. (2021). Self-regulation behaviours of a gifted student in mathematical abstraction process. Turkish International Journal of Special Education and Guidance & Counseling, 10(2), 152–168. Retrieved from https://www.tijseg.org/index.php/tijseg/article/view/145
Dreyfus, T., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. (2015). The Nested Epistemic Actions Model for Abstraction in Context: Theory as Methodological Tool and Methodological Tool as Theory. In A. Bikner-ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 185–217). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6
Ferrari, P. L. (2003). Abstraction in mathematics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358(1435), 1225–1230. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1316
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Development Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/CLVII.dec14.424-a
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C. L., Owen, R., … Jancek, D. (2003). Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on third-grade students’ mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.293
Gilboa, N., Kidron, I., & Dreyfus, T. (2019). Constructing a mathematical definition: the case of the tangent. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(3), 421–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1516824
Guerrero-Ortiz, C., Mena-Lorca, J., & Soto, A. M. (2018). Fostering Transit between Real World and Mathematical World: Some Phases on the Modelling Cycle. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(8), 1605–1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9856-9
Guler, H. K., & Gurbuz, M. C. (2018). Construction process of the length of ∛2 by paper folding. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.382940
Hershkowitz, R., Hadas, N., Dreyfus, T., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). Abstracting processes, from individuals’ constructing of knowledge to a group’s “shared knowledge.” Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(2), 41–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217455
Jamil, A. F., Siswono, T. Y. E., & Setianingsih, R. (2023a). Metacognitive Regulation in Collaborative Problem-Solving: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review. In H. Polat, A. A. Khan, & M. D. Kaya (Eds.), Studies on Education, Science, and Technology 2023 (pp. 32–62). USA: ISTES Organization.
Jamil, A. F., Siswono, T. Y. E., & Setianingsih, R. (2023b). The Emergence and Form of Metacognitive Regulation : Case Study of More and Less Successful Outcome Groups in Solving Geometry Problems Collaboratively. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 15(1), 25–43.
Jin, Q., & Kim, M. (2018). Metacognitive Regulation During Elementary Students’ Collaborative Group Work. Interchange, 49(2), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-018-9327-4
Juniarti, A., Jojo, Z., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2022). Designing the learning trajectory for the topic of circles through a tambourine context. Journal of Honai Math, 5(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v5i1.239
Kohen, Z., & Kramarski, B. (2018). Promoting Mathematics Teachers’ Pedagogical Metacognition: A Theoretical-Practical Model and Case Study. In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, & D. R. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education: Learning, Teaching and Assessment (pp. 279–305). Springer.
Liptak, J., & Scholtzova, I. (2021). Preparing Junior School Aged Pupils for a Circle Definition: Teaching Mathematics within Physical Education Class. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10(2), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2021.2.395
Nelson, T. O. (1990). Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings. Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory, 26(C), 125–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5
Noto, M. S., Hartono, W., & Sundawan, D. (2016). Analysis of Students Mathematical Representation and Connection on Analytical Geometry Subject. Infinity Journal, 5(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v5i2.216
Pawlikowski, M. J. (2014). Effects of social metacognition on geometric reasoning and micro-creativity: Groups of students constructing proofs.
Scheiner, T., & Pinto, M. M. F. (2016). Images of Abstraction in Mathematics Education: Contradictions, Controversies, And Convergences. Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 155–162. Szeged: Publisher: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
Suprapti, E. D. (2020). Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Irisan Kerucut Melalui Model Discovery Learning. Edutainment, 8(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.35438/e.v8i1.226
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
Vittal, P. R. (2013). Analytical Geometry 2D and 3D. Chennai: Pearson India.
Yeşildere, S., & Türnüklü, E. (2008). An investigation of the components affecting knowledge construction processes of students with differing mathematical power. Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (31), 151–169. Retrieved from https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/76822/an-investigation-of-the-components-affecting-knowledge-construction-processes-of-students-with-differing-mathematical-power
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i2.5252
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Yus Mochamad Cholily, Anis Farida Jamil, Mayang Dintarini
Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Abstracted/Indexed by:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.