RETRACT

Yus Mochamad Cholily; Anis Farida Jamil; Mayang Dintarini

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v16i2.5252

RETRACT

Yus Mochamad Cholily, Anis Farida Jamil, Mayang Dintarini

Abstract

This article has been withdrawn at the authors' request due to the need for adjustment related to permission for the use of research instruments from a previous source.

References

An, Y.-J., & Cao, L. (2014). Examining the Effects of Metacognitive Scaffolding on Students’ Design Problem Solving and Metacognitive Skills in an Online Environment. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 10(4), 552–568. Retrieved from http://proxy.lib.odu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=100728963&site=eds-live&scope=site

Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2007). Predators of knowledge construction: Interpreting students’ metacognition in an amusement park physics program. Science Education, 91(2), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20176

Bakar, M. A. A., & Ismail, N. (2019). Merging of metacognitive regulation strategies and activity based learning through best seller mathematical learning activities to enhance student’s mastery of mathematics. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9A), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071618

Bellon, E., Fias, W., & Smedt, B. De. (2021). Too Anxious to Be Confident? A Panel Longitudinal Study Into the Interplay of Mathematics Anxiety and Metacognitive Monitoring in Arithmetic Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(8), 1550–1564. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000704

Cosar, M. Ç., & Kesan, C. (2021). Self-regulation behaviours of a gifted student in mathematical abstraction process. Turkish International Journal of Special Education and Guidance & Counseling, 10(2), 152–168. Retrieved from https://www.tijseg.org/index.php/tijseg/article/view/145

Dreyfus, T., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. (2015). The Nested Epistemic Actions Model for Abstraction in Context: Theory as Methodological Tool and Methodological Tool as Theory. In A. Bikner-ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 185–217). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6

Ferrari, P. L. (2003). Abstraction in mathematics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358(1435), 1225–1230. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1316

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Development Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/CLVII.dec14.424-a

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C. L., Owen, R., … Jancek, D. (2003). Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on third-grade students’ mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.293

Gilboa, N., Kidron, I., & Dreyfus, T. (2019). Constructing a mathematical definition: the case of the tangent. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(3), 421–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1516824

Guerrero-Ortiz, C., Mena-Lorca, J., & Soto, A. M. (2018). Fostering Transit between Real World and Mathematical World: Some Phases on the Modelling Cycle. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(8), 1605–1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9856-9

Guler, H. K., & Gurbuz, M. C. (2018). Construction process of the length of ∛2 by paper folding. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.382940

Hershkowitz, R., Hadas, N., Dreyfus, T., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). Abstracting processes, from individuals’ constructing of knowledge to a group’s “shared knowledge.” Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(2), 41–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217455

Jamil, A. F., Siswono, T. Y. E., & Setianingsih, R. (2023a). Metacognitive Regulation in Collaborative Problem-Solving: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review. In H. Polat, A. A. Khan, & M. D. Kaya (Eds.), Studies on Education, Science, and Technology 2023 (pp. 32–62). USA: ISTES Organization.

Jamil, A. F., Siswono, T. Y. E., & Setianingsih, R. (2023b). The Emergence and Form of Metacognitive Regulation : Case Study of More and Less Successful Outcome Groups in Solving Geometry Problems Collaboratively. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 15(1), 25–43.

Jin, Q., & Kim, M. (2018). Metacognitive Regulation During Elementary Students’ Collaborative Group Work. Interchange, 49(2), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-018-9327-4

Juniarti, A., Jojo, Z., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2022). Designing the learning trajectory for the topic of circles through a tambourine context. Journal of Honai Math, 5(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v5i1.239

Kohen, Z., & Kramarski, B. (2018). Promoting Mathematics Teachers’ Pedagogical Metacognition: A Theoretical-Practical Model and Case Study. In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, & D. R. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education: Learning, Teaching and Assessment (pp. 279–305). Springer.

Liptak, J., & Scholtzova, I. (2021). Preparing Junior School Aged Pupils for a Circle Definition: Teaching Mathematics within Physical Education Class. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10(2), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2021.2.395

Nelson, T. O. (1990). Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings. Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory, 26(C), 125–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5

Noto, M. S., Hartono, W., & Sundawan, D. (2016). Analysis of Students Mathematical Representation and Connection on Analytical Geometry Subject. Infinity Journal, 5(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v5i2.216

Pawlikowski, M. J. (2014). Effects of social metacognition on geometric reasoning and micro-creativity: Groups of students constructing proofs.

Scheiner, T., & Pinto, M. M. F. (2016). Images of Abstraction in Mathematics Education: Contradictions, Controversies, And Convergences. Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 155–162. Szeged: Publisher: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

Suprapti, E. D. (2020). Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Irisan Kerucut Melalui Model Discovery Learning. Edutainment, 8(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.35438/e.v8i1.226

Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0

Vittal, P. R. (2013). Analytical Geometry 2D and 3D. Chennai: Pearson India.

Yeşildere, S., & Türnüklü, E. (2008). An investigation of the components affecting knowledge construction processes of students with differing mathematical power. Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (31), 151–169. Retrieved from https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/76822/an-investigation-of-the-components-affecting-knowledge-construction-processes-of-students-with-differing-mathematical-power

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i2.5252