Document Analysis of English Course Syllabus in Business Administration: A Critical Evaluation of Syllabus Design

Tanti Nur Khasanah; Nanang Heri Setyo Dwi Cahyo; Satriani Satriani; Sri Rachmajanti

doi:10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5505

Document Analysis of English Course Syllabus in Business Administration: A Critical Evaluation of Syllabus Design

Tanti Nur Khasanah, Nanang Heri Setyo Dwi Cahyo, Satriani Satriani, Sri Rachmajanti

Abstract

This study critically evaluates an English course syllabus for Business Administration Department at a leading Indonesian university, focusing on its alignment with needs analysis and syllabus content. Adopting a qualitative approach, the research integrates document analysis and a structured interview with the syllabus developer to identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. The structured interview explored the Present Situation Analysis (PSA) in syllabus implementation, while critical document analysis examined the Target Situation Analysis (TSA) envisioned by the syllabus, enabling the identification of gaps and actionable solutions. Findings reveal that the syllabus relies on outdated needs analysis data, lacks adherence to the ABCD model in learning objectives, exhibits limited diversity in perspectives and examples, and omits operational verbs in learning indicators, resulting in ambiguity and misalignment with students’ practical needs. Additionally, assessments neglect the psychomotor and affective domains, suffer from unclear scoring rubrics, and display inconsistencies in grading criteria, limiting the syllabus's ability to prepare students for real-world business communication demands. This study contributes to educational sciences by underscoring the importance of updated needs analysis and comprehensive curriculum design for improving instructional effectiveness. It offers actionable recommendations for curriculum developers and educators, advocating for General English courses tailored to specific academic and professional contexts. The findings provide a framework for future syllabus development, emphasizing the integration of inclusive content, clear learning objectives, and robust assessment strategies to support higher education practices in addressing the evolving demands of a globalized and diverse student body.

Keywords

English course syllabus; critical evaluation; needs analysis; syllabus analysis; English for business administration

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ailani, N. a. W., Kanaan, N. G. P., & Kay, N. D. (2023). Examining the impact of Bloom’s taxonomy integration in entrepreneurship education on the competitiveness and performance of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). Manajemen Kreatif Jurnal, 1(3), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.55606/makreju.v1i3.2924

Aldukhayel, D. M. (2017). Exploring students’ perspectives toward clarity and familiarity of writing scoring rubrics: the case of Saudi EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 10(10), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n10p1

Ardinal, B. T., & Anwar, D. (2021). An analysis of ESP syllabus at SMK Nusatama Padang based on needs analysis result. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT-8 2020), 207–211. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210914.040

Ariyanto, S. R., Munoto, M., & Muhaji, M. (2019). Development of affective authentic assessment instruments for automotive engineering expertise in vocational school. Jurnal Taman Vokasi, 7(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.30738/jtv.v7i1.4777

Bali, M. M. E. I., & Musrifah, M. (2020). The problems of application of online learning in the affective and psychomotor domains during the COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 17(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2020.172-03

Banda, S., Phiri, F., Kaale, J., Banda, A., Mpolomoka, D., Chikopela, R., & Mushibwe, C. (2023). Application of Bloom’s taxonomy in categorization of cognitive process development in colleges. Journal of Education and Practice. https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/14-4-02

Becker, A. (2016). Student-generated scoring rubrics: examining their formative value for improving ESL students’ writing performance. Assessing Writing, 29, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.05.002

Bin-Tahir, S. Z., Suriaman, A., & Rinantanti, Y. (2019). Designing English syllabus for multilingual students at pesantren schools. Asian EFL Journal Research Articles, 23(3.3), 5-27. https://www.elejournals.com/asian-efl-journal/asian-efl-journal-volume-23-issue-3-3-may-2019/

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Bowers-Campbell, J. (2015). Investigating the syllabus as a defining document. Journal of College Reding and Learning, 45(2), 106-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2015.1030240.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Appropriate criteria: key to effective rubrics. Frontiers in Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00022

Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. Heinle & Heinle Publisher.

Brumfit, C. J. (1984). General English syllabus design: Curriculum and syllabus design for the general English classroom. Pergamon Press.

Chowdhury, F. (2018). Application of rubrics in the classroom: a vital tool for improvement in assessment, feedback and learning. International Education Studies, 12(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n1p61

Cowling, J. D. (2007). Needs analysis: planning a syllabus for a series of intensive workplace courses at a leading Japanese company. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 426-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.003

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (4th Ed). Pearson

Devies, B., Ostermeyer, E., Allbritton, M., Pacheco, D., Dizor, C., Henry, K., … & Clay, A. (2022). Reimagining curriculum design: using focus groups to enhance leadership educator practice. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies, 3(2), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.52547/johepal.3.2.103

Dharmasaroja, P. (2020). Integration of the WFME standards and AUN-QA criteria for student assessment in undergraduate medical education. Ramathibodi Medical Journal, 43(4), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.33165/rmj.2020.43.4.240075

Dorji, P., & Yangzom. (2021). Affective domain: the uncharted area of teaching and learning in tertiary education. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.9734/arjass/2021/v13i130206

Gan, S., Bhattamisra, S. K., Zulkefeli, N. M., & Ho, K. L. (2023). Pharmacy students’ and supervisors’ perceptions of the effectiveness of assessment rubrics for undergraduate research performance review. Pharmacy Education, 23(1), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2023.231.193204

Goodwin, R. (2019). Opportunities and questions: a short report on rubric assessments in Asia and the Middle East. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3465982

Gorani, A. A. A., & Ghafor, O. F. (2022). The role of needs analysis in designing a digital syllabus for EFL undergraduate programs. Journal of Language Studies, 5(4, 1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.25130/jls.5.4.1.2

Gupta, S., & Chauhan, S. (2020). Exploring the use of rubrics as a self assessment tool for pre-service teachers. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(10), 781–786. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.10.1458

Gurung, G., Moltow, D., & Brett, P. (2019). Exploring the influence of the curriculum on student learning in culturally and ethnically diverse classroom contexts: praxis, paradoxes and perspectives of stakeholders. Waikato Journal of Education, 24(2), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v24i2.671

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learner-centered approach. Cambridge University Press.

Iranmehr, A., Atai, M. R., & Babaii, E. (2018). Evaluation of EAP programs in Iran: Document analysis and expert perspectives. Applied Research on English Language, 7(2), 171-194. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2018.104481.1123.

Irizarry, J., Evans, M., & Meyer, S. (2023). Street-level pedagogy: fostering and communicating social equity through course syllabi. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 53(3), 790-812. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640231169964

Kabouha, R., & Elyas, T. (2015). Aligning teaching and assessment to course objectives: the case of preparatory year English program at King Abdulaziz University. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.5p.82

Kelly, A. V. (1999). The curriculum: theory and practice. (4th Ed). Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.

Leibold, N., Schwarz, L., & Gordon, D. (2022). Culturally responsive teaching in nursing education: a faculty development project. Creative Nursing, 28(3), 154-160. https://doi.org/10.1891/cn-2021-0044

Lidyasari, A. T., Rachmawati, I., Costa, A., & Wanyi, P. (2022). How are the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor levels of primary school learners living in suburban area of Yogyakarta based on career development? Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 10(2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v10i2.48061

Lowenthal, P. & Lomellini, A. (2022). Accessible online learning: a preliminary investigation of educational technologists’ and faculty members’ knowledge and skills. Techtrends, 67(2), 384-392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00790-1

Mancho-Barés, G., & Lludra, E. (2013). Internationalization of Business English communication at university: A three-fold needs analysis. Ibérica, (26), 151-169. http://www.revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/277

Mager, R. F. (1997). Preparing instructional objectives. CEP Press.

Mardanti, N. and Abadi, I. (2021). Contextual approach animated video in science material for grade fourth elementary school students. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 4(2), 167. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v4i2.39431

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (Revised and expanded from case study research in education edition). Josey-Bass Publisher.

Munandar, I. (2020). A critical review of the Singapore English language syllabus as an advance syllabus in English language teaching (ELT). Jurnal As-Salam, 4(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.37249/as-salam.v4i1.172

Munandar, H., & Junita, S. (2022). The effectiveness of psychomotor evaluation using peer assessment in the practicum activities. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(3), 569–578. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i3.24797

Mpuangnan, K. (2023). Community voices in curriculum development. Curriculum Perspectives, 44(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-023-00223-w

Nawrin, T., & Sadek, A. (2023). Role of rubric in assessment of language learning in higher Education. Teacher’s World Journal of Education and Research, 48(2), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.3329/twjer.v48i2.67555

Nayef, E. G., Yaacob, N. R. N., & Ismail, H. N. (2013). Taxonomies of educational Objective domain. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(9). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v3-i9/199

Nunan, D. (1988). Syllabus design. Oxford University Press.

Pishghadam, R., & Zabihi, R. (2012). Life syllabus: A new research agenda in English language teaching. TESOL Arabia Perspecctive, 19(1), 23-27. https://typeset.io/pdf/life-syllabus-a-new-research-agenda-in-english-language-mkym50nwur.pdf

Rahmah, A., & Zaim, M. (2021). An analysis of operational verb of learning indicators in curriculum 2013 lesson plans. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT-8 2020), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210914.009

Robins, J., Sanguras, L., & Carpenter, A. (2023). Development of an online, culturally responsive, accelerated language arts curriculum for middle school students. Gifted Child Today, 46(3), 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175231168445

Rønning, S. B., & Bjørkly, S. (2019). The use of clinical role-play and reflection in learning therapeutic communication skills in mental health education: an integrative review. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 10, 415–425. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s202115

Ruben, S., Setiawan, I., Illu, W., & Wahyuni, S. (2020). Promoting the affective domain within global pandemic: the challenge of Christian education. International Research Journal on Advanced Science Hub, 2(9), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.47392/irjash.2020.138

Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative the researcher. (2nd ed). SAGE Publications Inc.

Septiana, I., Petrus, I., & Inderawati, R. (2020). Needs analysis-based English syllabus for computer science students of Bina Darma University. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(2), 299-310. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v8i2.3027

Singh, C. K. S., Singh, T. S. M., Ja’far, H., Tek, O. E., Kaur, H., Mostafa, N. A., & Yunus, M. M. (2020). Teaching strategies to develop higher order thinking skills in English literature. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change, 11(8), 211-231. https://www.ijicc.net/images/vol11iss8/11816_Singh_2020_E_R.pdf

Sudipa, I. N., Aryati, K. F., Susanta, I. P. A. E., & Anggayana, I. W. A. (2020). The development of syllabus and lesson plan based on English for occupational pruposes. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(4), 290-300. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I4/PR201009.

Sulistiana, D. (2016). Kemampuan mahasiswa ppl merumuskan tujuan pembelajaran pada materi sma/ma kelas x. Konstruktivisme Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 8(1), 54-60. https://doi.org/10.30957/konstruk.v8i1.5

Susandi, N. K. A. S., & Krishnawati, N. L. P. (2016). Needs analysis: ESP syllabus design for Indonesian EFL nursing students. Proceeding of the Fourth International Seminar on English Language and Teaching (ISELT-4). https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/selt/article/view/6969/5503

Tabari, A. G. (2013). Challenges of language syllabus design in EFL/ESL contexts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4), 869-873. https://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/jltr/vol04/04/29.pdf

Tuma, F. & Nassar, A. (2021). Applying bloom's taxonomy in clinical surgery: practical examples. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102656

Vietze, J., Jongerling, J., Senathirajah, R., Sutrisno, R., & Meeuwisse, M. (2022). The student-curriculum interplay: a mixed-methods exploration of diversity-related learning goals, content integration, and students' academic performance in higher education. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zvjud

Wang, X., Su, Y., Cheung, S., Wong, E., & Kwong, T. (2012). An exploration of Biggs’ constructive alignment in course design and its impact on students’ learning approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(4), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.658018

Woodrow, L. (2018). Introducing course design in English for specific purposes. Routledge.

Wotring, A. R., Chen, H., & Fraser, M. (2021). Exploring curriculum alignment through syllabus document analysis: From national language policy to local ELT Practice. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 9(2), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2021.121045

Yasmin, F., Farooq, N. M. U., & Shah, N. S. K. (2023). Impact of exam-oriented education system on undergraduate students’ cognitive, affective and psychomotor competencies. International Journal of Linguistics and Culture, 4(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.52700/ijlc.v4i1.180

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5505