A Conceptual Study on Teachers’ Leadership Values

Eric Hermawan, Naufal Mahfudz, Cris Kuntadi, Antoni Ludfi Arifin, Antaiwan Bowo Pranogyo

Abstract


This study aims to undertake a conceptual analysis of the leadership principles exhibited by a teaching staff, focusing on six key aspects: concentration, open-mindedness, respect, striving for excellence, being the best, and integrity.   This study is a theoretical examination of the leadership principles exhibited by educational faculty. This study employs a qualitative descriptive approach.   The data was collected from scientific journal articles written in English and Indonesian. The databases that were searched include CiteBase, Cybertesis, Dissertation Library, and ProQuest.   The selected publications were thoroughly examined, including the abstract, data analysis, methodologies, and aims, in order to acquire information about the significance of leadership in teaching staff.   The findings show that the goal of leadership is to direct and focus.   Leaders must be self-directed to achieve this.  The teacher must focus ourselves and connect constructively with others. This helps leaders in education improve emotional intelligence.  A responsive mentality can help teachers adapt and handle unusual assignments and colleagues.   Respectful teaching staff leadership means treating everyone with respect and real attention, regardless of rank, status, or position.   Excellence requires constant effort and the pursuit of the highest work standards.   Excellence in leadership means achieving excellent team performance while giving support, direction, and growth opportunities to colleagues, motivating and inspiring them.   Teacher integrity is essential for a school or college's success.   Leadership principles strongly influence an educator's beliefs, actions, and decisions.


Keywords


Leadership, Lecturer, Values

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abu Bakar, H., & McCann, R. M. (2016). The mediating effect of leader-member dyadic communication style agreement on the relationship between servant leadership and group-level organizational citizenship behavior. Management Communication Quarterly, 23(30), 32–58.

Addie, L. (2006). A study of the leadership skills needs of business in a community college leadership development curriculum. Minnesota: Capella University.

Alimo-Metcalfe, B., & Alban-Metcalfe, R. J. (2001). The development of a new transformational leadership questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(3), 1–27.

Avolio, TJ, B. W. F. and W. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(2), 421–449.

Ayman, S. R. K. K. and M. (2009). Is transformational leadership always perceived as effective? Male subordinates’ devaluation of female transformational leaders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(4), 852–879.

Bass, B. M. dan P. S. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transfer- mational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217.

Bauman, D. (2011). Integrity, identity, and why moral exemplars do what is right. Washington University.

Brodbeck, F. F. M. and J. (2002). ) Leadership made in Germany: Low on compassion, high on performance. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 16–29.

Brown, M. (2006). Corporate Integrity and Public Interest: A Relational Approach to Business Ethics and Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(6), 11–18. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s 10551 -006-9050-4.

Clarke, N. (2011). An integrated conceptual model of respect in leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 316–327.

Clarkson, J. (2009). Perceptions of leadership and integrity. A correlation of followers’ assessments. Capella University.

Craig., B. B. . &. (2006). When Actions Speak Louder than Words: The Relative Importance of Leader Behaviors in Predicting Global Impressions of Integrity, in M. Hargis (chair). Leadership. It’s All Relative: Applying Relative Importance Statistics to Leadership. Symposium Conducted at the Annual Conference of the Academy of Management.

Gaines, K. (2007). A communicative theory of leadership practice. Antioch University.

Gardner, B. J. D. W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development Get-ting to the root of positive forms of leader-ship. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338.

Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership That Gets Results. Harvard Business Review, 94–97.

Henderson, D. (2007). The Leadership Triad: Identity-Integrity-Authenticity A Case Study of the Inner Life and Leadership of Educational Leaders. In Montana. University of Montana.

Kartono, K. (2017). Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan Apakah Kepemimpinan Abnormal Itu. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Kasmawati. (2017). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Guru Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik di SMP Negeri 5 Enrekang. Jurnal Idaarah, 11(1), 181–190.

Kouzes, B. and P. (2002). The Five Exemplary Leadership. The Leadership Challenge: How to Get Extraordinary Things Done in Organizations. Jossey-Bass.

Kunandar. (2011). Guru Profesional Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) dan Sukses dalam Sertifikasi Guru. Rajawali Pers.

Leroy, H. Palanski, M. E., & Simons, T. (2012). Authentic Leadership and Behavioral Integrity as Drivers of Follower Commitment and Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 255–264.

McCann, R. & H. (2009). ). Ethical Leadership and Organizations: An Analysis of Leadership in the manufacturing Industry Based on the Perceived Leadership Integrity Scale. . . Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 211-220. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1007/s 10551 -008-9880-3

Nasution, K. (2016). Kepemimpinan Guru dalam Meningkatkan Efektivitas Pembelajaran. Jurnal Drulilmi, 4(4), 116–128.

O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 487-516.

Overstreet, R. E., Hazen, B. T., Skipper, J. B., & Hanna, J. B. (2014). Bridging the gap between strategy and performance: Using leadership style to enable structural elements. Journal of Business Logistics, 35(3), 136–149.

Parris, D. L, & Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(3), 377–393.

Parry, K. W, & Proctor-Thomson, S. (2002). Perceived integrity of transformational leaders in organizational settings. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2), 75–96.

Philip, A, T. (2013). Perception of Leadership Style. Leadership Effectiveness, and Leadership Integrity: A Correlation of Follower’s Assessment. Capella University.

Priansa, D. J. (2014). Kinerja dan Profesionalisme Guru. Alfabeta.

Sari, Sindang, H. (2017). Pengaruh Kreativitas, Komunikasi, dan Kepemimpinan Guru Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa pada SMP Negeri di Kecamatan Ilir Timur II Palembang. Jurnal Ecoment, 2(1), 74–87.

Sataria, T. (2016). Kepemimpinan. Graha llmu.

Setiawan, D. (2013). Peran Pendidikan Karakter dalam Mengembangkan Kecerdasan Moral. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 3(1), 54–55.

Setiawan, D. (2014). Pendidikan Karakter Dalam Perspektif Kewarganegaraan. Lembaga Riset Publik.

Setiawan, D. (2017). Urgensi Tuntutan Profesionalisme Dan Harapan Menjadi Guru Berkarakter. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(1), 127.

Sugiyono, P. D. (2016). metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif,dan R&D. In Alfabeta, cv.

Yahya, A. M. & A. (2007). Guru Sang Pemimpin. Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.2655

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Antoni Ludfi Arifin

Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Abstracted/Indexed by:

    

 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.