Epistemological Perspectives in Inclusive Education: A Systematic Review of Differentiated Instruction Practices Across Contexts

Authors

  • Fuji Lestari Universitas Riau, Indonesia
  • Mahdum Mahdum Universitas Riau, Indonesia
  • Jimmi Copriady Universitas Riau, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i1.8663

Keywords:

epistemology, inclusive education, differentiated learning

Abstract

This study situates inclusive education within broader epistemological debates, emphasizing how differing conceptions of knowledge shape differentiated instruction practices across diverse educational contexts . The purpose of this systematic review is to examine how empiricist, constructivist, and hybrid epistemological orientations influence the design and implementation of differentiated instruction in inclusive settings, and to identify contextual factors mediating this relationship. Employing PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search of the Scopus database (2019–2024) yielded 43 peer-reviewed studies, which were analyzed through thematic synthesis and comparative frameworks. The findings reveal three dominant orientations: constructivist approaches (44%) emphasize student-centered, flexible, and experiential learning; empiricist approaches (30%) prioritize data-driven, structured, and assessment-based practices; while hybrid approaches (26%) integrate both perspectives pragmatically. The review further identifies teacher preparation, policy frameworks, and governance structures as key mediating factors influencing how epistemological beliefs translate into classroom practice. Notably, only 28% of studies reported explicit teacher reflection on epistemological foundations, indicating a gap between theory and practice. The study concludes that epistemological orientations fundamentally shape differentiated instruction and inclusive education outcomes. It proposes the Epistemology-Practice-Context (EPC) model to conceptualize the dynamic interaction between beliefs, contextual conditions, and pedagogical practices. These findings highlight the need for enhancing teachers’ epistemological literacy and aligning policy frameworks with diverse educational contexts to improve the effectiveness of inclusive education.

References

Alkın, Z. E., & Anılan, B. (2024). Differentiated instruction in the world and Türkiye through studies. Osmangazi Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 156-184.

Bayram, B., & Öztürk, M. (2021). Opinions and practices of social studies teachers on inclusive education. Egitim ve Bilim, 46(206), 355-377. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.9179

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Bray, M., & Thomas, R. M. (1995). Levels of comparison in educational studies: Different insights from different literatures and the value of multilevel analyses. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 472-490.

D'Intino, J. S., & Wang, L. (2021). Differentiated instruction: A review of teacher education practices for Canadian pre-service elementary school teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(5), 668-681. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1951603

Gaitas, S., Carêto, C., Peixoto, F., & Castro Silva, J. (2024). Differentiated instruction: 'to be, or not to be, that is the question.' International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(11), 2607-2623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2022.2119290

Gheyssens, E., Consuegra, E., Engels, N., & Struyven, K. (2020). Good things come to those who wait: The importance of professional development for the implementation of differentiated instruction. Frontiers in Education, 5, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00096

Gibbs, K. (2023). Differentiation in practice: An exploratory investigation in an Australian mainstream secondary school. Teaching Education, 34(4), 384-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2022.2161508

Gonzales, A. O. (2018). Educación Inclusiva: una teoría sin disciplina. Legados y recuperación de los saberes diaspóricos para una epistemología heterotópica. In I Congreso Iberoamericano de Docentes. REDIB-Universidad de Cádiz.

Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., & Vantieghem, W. (2021). Exploring pre-service teachers' beliefs and practices about two inclusive frameworks: Universal Design for Learning and differentiated instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107, 103503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103503

Leballo, M., Griffiths, D., & Bekker, T. (2021). Differentiation practices in a private and government high school classroom in Lesotho: Evaluating teacher responses. South African Journal of Education, 41(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v41n1a1835

Nepal, S., Walker, S., & Dillon-Wallace, J. (2024). How do Australian pre-service teachers understand differentiated instruction and associated concepts of inclusion and diversity? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1916111

Nketsia, W., Opoku, M. P., Amponteng, M., & Mprah, W. K. (2024). Exploring the perceived knowledge of teacher educators and pre-service teachers on the differentiated instruction practices of teacher educators. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1356675

Onyishi, C. N., & Sefotho, M. M. (2020). Teachers' perspectives on the use of differentiated instruction in inclusive classrooms: Implication for teacher education. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 136-150. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n6p136

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pozas, M., & Letzel-Alt, V. (2023). Teacher collaboration, inclusive education and differentiated instruction: A matter of exchange, co-construction, or synchronization? Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2240941

Pozas, M., Letzel, V., Lindner, K. T., & Schwab, S. (2021). DI (Differentiated Instruction) does matter! The effects of DI on secondary school students' well-being, social inclusion and academic self-concept. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.729027

Sheehy, K., Budiyanto, Kaye, H., & Rofiah, K. (2019). Indonesian teachers' epistemological beliefs and inclusive education. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 23(1), 39-56.

Souza, C. G. N. M., & Martins, R. L. (2023). Epistemological conceptions and pedagogical practices of the teachers of Vale dos Sinos/RS in the context of inclusive education. Seven Editora.

Stavroussi, P., Didaskalou, E., & Greif Green, J. (2021). Are teachers' democratic beliefs about classroom life associated with their perceptions of inclusive education? International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 68(5), 627-642.

Strogilos, V. (2018). The value of differentiated instruction in the inclusion of students with special needs/disabilities in mainstream schools. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 42, p. 00003). EDP Sciences.

Strogilos, V., Avramidis, E., Voulagka, A., & Tragoulia, E. (2020). Differentiated instruction for students with disabilities in early childhood co-taught classrooms: Types and quality of modifications. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(4), 443-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1466928

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). ASCD.

Wang, T., & Tian, G. (2023). Linking distributed leadership with differentiated instruction in inclusive schools: The mediating roles of teacher leadership and professional competence. Behavioral Sciences, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13120990

Downloads

Published

2026-03-29

How to Cite

Lestari, F., Mahdum, M., & Copriady, J. (2026). Epistemological Perspectives in Inclusive Education: A Systematic Review of Differentiated Instruction Practices Across Contexts. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 18(1), 629–639. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i1.8663

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026): MARCH 2026

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.