Impact of Peer Mentoring Strategy on Islamic Elementary Teachers’ Professional Development

Authors

  • Ahmad Sulhan Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1927

Keywords:

Elementary School, Mentoring, Professional, Peer

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of peer mentoring strategies on the professional development of teachers in elementary schools. This research uses a case study. There are 15 schools as research objects consisting of Private Elementary Schools, State Elementary Schools, and Islamic Elementary Schools. Data collection techniques were carried out through observation, documents, and questionnaires. Data analysis was carried out in two stages, namely (1) analysis of single or individual case data and (2) analysis of cross-case data. Checking the validity of the data in this study using the theory of Lincoln and Guba consists of 4 steps: credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. The results of the study indicate that the peer mentoring system has had an impact on increasing competencies that are relevant to current needs. Professional development has been built with close partnerships with colleagues, building innovations in teaching and learning, and scheduled mentoring management. Professional development through the peer mentoring process has had an impact on increasing teacher competency qualifications including pedagogic, personality, social and professional which has been described in the Teacher and Lecturer Law no. 14 of 2005. Thus, the peer mentoring process has many impacts on innovation and creativity improvement. the quality of each teacher.

Author Biography

Ahmad Sulhan, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Manajemen Pendidikan

References

Alsaleh, A., Alabdulhadi, M., & Alrwaished, N. (2017). Impact of peer coaching strategy on pre-service teachers’ professional development growth in Kuwait. International Journal of Educational Research, 86, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJER.2017.07.011

Alt, D. (2018). Science teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning, ICT efficacy, ICT professional development and ICT practices enacted in their classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.020

Avalos, B. (2011, January). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 27, pp. 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007

Avidov-Ungar, O., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2018). Professional identity of teacher educators in the digital era in light of demands of pedagogical innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.017

Britton, L. R., & Anderson, K. A. (2010). Peer coaching and pre-service teachers: Examining an underutilised concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.008

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research, educational planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. London & New York: Pearson Education.

De Vries, S., Jansen, E. P. W. A., & van de Grift, W. J. C. M. (2013). Profiling teachers’ continuing professional development and the relation with their beliefs about learning and teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.006

Dille, K. B., & Røkenes, F. M. (2021). Teachers’ professional development in formal online communities: A scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103431. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2021.103431

Ha, X. Van, & Murray, J. C. (2021). The impact of a professional development program on EFL teachers’ beliefs about corrective feedback. System, 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102405

Hayes, N., & Pridham, B. (2019). The Role of Mentoring in Teacher Education. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190264093.013.851

Huston, T., & Weaver, C. L. (2008). Peer coaching: Professional development for experienced faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 33(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10755-007-9061-9

Kahraman, M., & Kuzu, A. (2016). E-mentoring for professional development of pre-service teachers: A case study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.17718/TOJDE.19973

Kemmis, S., Heikkinen, H. L. T., Fransson, G., Aspfors, J., & Edwards-Groves, C. (2014). Mentoring of new teachers as a contested practice: Supervision, support and collaborative self-development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2014.07.001

Kovalchuck, V., & Vorotnykova, I. (2017). E-coaching, e-mentoring for lifelong professional development of teachers within the system of post-graduate pedagogical education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(3), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.17718/TOJDE.328956

McAleer, D., & Bangert, A. (2011). Professional growth through online mentoring: A study of mathematics mentor teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 83–115. https://doi.org/10.2190/ec.44.1.e

Ninlawan, G. (2015). Factors Which Affect Teachers’ Professional Development in Teaching Innovation and Educational Technology in the 21st Century under the Bureau of Special Education, Office of the Basic Education Commission. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1732–1735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.228

Quintana, M. G. B., & Zambrano, E. P. (2014). E-mentoring: The effects on pedagogical training of rural teachers with complex geographical accesses. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.042

Rhodes, C., & Beneicke, S. (2002). Coaching, mentoring and peer-networking: challenges for the management of teacher professional development in schools. Journal of In-Service Education, 28(2), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580200200184

Richter, E., Brunner, M., & Richter, D. (2021). Teacher educators’ task perception and its relationship to professional identity and teaching practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103303

Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103305. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2021.103305

Shanks, G., & Bekmamedova, N. (2018). Case study research in information systems. Research Methods: Information, Systems, and Contexts: Second Edition, 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102220-7.00007-8

Single, P. B., & Single, R. M. (2005). E-mentoring for social equity: Review of research to inform program development. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 13(2), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260500107481

Thompsona, L., Jeffriesa, M., & Topping, K. (2010). E-mentoring for e-learning development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2010.498182

Voroshilov, V. (2017). Professional Designing as One of Key Competencies of Modern Teacher. Facilitating In-Service Teacher Training for Professional Development, pp. 276–299. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1747-4.ch016

Zeng, L. M. (2020, November 1). Peer review of teaching in higher education: A systematic review of its impact on the professional development of university teachers from the teaching expertise perspective. Educational Research Review, Vol. 31, p. 100333. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100333

Downloads

Published

2022-04-20

How to Cite

Sulhan, A. (2022). Impact of Peer Mentoring Strategy on Islamic Elementary Teachers’ Professional Development. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1927

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2022): AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.