Navigating the Journey: A Phenomenological Exploration of Graduate Students’ Experiences in Scientific Article Writing

Fitri Yuliana, Sulis Triyono, Ashadi Ashadi

Abstract


Writing scientific articles presents considerable challenges for many graduate students, often due to insufficient support and resources. As academic publishing is crucial for scholarly development, understanding the obstacles students face is essential for providing effective interventions. This qualitative study employed a phenomenological approach to explore the experiences of ten graduate students from diverse academic disciplines and semesters. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews, preceded by an e-reflection exercise completed by each participant. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) was used to examine the data, following steps such as identifying significant themes, interpreting their meaning, and synthesizing the findings. The analysis revealed three primary challenges in scientific writing: difficulty selecting a topic, poor time management, and limited academic writing proficiency. To overcome these issues, students engaged in peer discussions, developed task lists, and participated in scientific writing training programs. These findings highlight the need for structured writing support within graduate programs. Institutions should consider implementing targeted interventions, such as peer writing groups and academic writing workshops, to enhance students’ writing competence and confidence. Graduate students encounter multifaceted challenges in scientific article writing. However, through collaborative strategies and institutional support, these obstacles can be effectively mitigated. Future research should further investigate scalable academic writing interventions to support student success.

Keywords


challenge; scientific article; writing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajjawi, R., & Higgs, J. (2007). Using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate how experienced practitioners learn to communicate clinical reasoning. The Qualitative Report, 12(4), 612-638. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol12/iss4/6

Al-Ghabra, I. M. M. M., & Najim, A. S. (2019). Analyzing errors committed in paragraph writing by undergraduates. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(2), 264-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1002.07

Birhan, A. T. (2021). Effects of teaching lexical bundles on efl students’ abstract genre academic writing skills improvement: Corpus-based research design. International Journal of Language Education, 5(1), 585-597. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i1.14917

Birhan, A. T., & Nurie, Y. (2024). Developing engineering students’ engagement in academic writing classes using corpus-based instruction. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00232-2

Born, V. & Brock, C. (2022). Writing for social sciences and humanities: bridge programs and improving graduate student outcomes. Journal of Political Science Education, 19(3), 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2022.2134020

Bracewell, R. J. (2020). Investigating the control of writing skills. in reading empirical research studies: the rhetoric of research. New York: Routledge.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chen, M., Mohammadi, M., & Izadpanah, S. (2024). Language learning through music on the academic achievement, creative thinking, and self-esteem of the English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. Acta Psychologica, 247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104318

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). California: Sage.

Farley, P. C. (2019). Using role-play to teach novice researcherss the expectations of journal editors and reviewers. English for Specific Purposes, 55, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.03.002

Gao, J., & Min, S. (2021). A comparative study of the effects of L1 and L2 prewriting discussions on L2 writing performance. System, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102654

Grimm, J., Langley, A., & Reinecke, J. (2024). Process Research Methods for Studying Supply Chains and Their Management. Journal of Supply Chain Managenent, 60(4), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12331

Jacob, S. A., & Furgerson, S. P. (2012). Writing interview protocols and conducting interviews: Tips for students new to the field of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 17(6), 1-10. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol17/iss42/3

Jr, F. J. D., & Noe, M. (2019). The teacher writing toolkit: enhancing undergraduate teaching of scientific writing in the biological sciences. Journal of Biological Education, 53(5), 524-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1501410

Keller, S. T., Lohmann, J., Trub, R., Fleckenstein, J., Meyer, J., Jansen, T., & Moller, J. (2024). Language quality, content, structure: what analytic ratings tell us about EFL writing skills at upper secondary school level in Germany and Switzerland. Journal of Second Language Writing, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101129

Khonamri, F., Hashemi, E., Pavlikova, M., & Petrasova, B. (2021). Coherence problems of efl students’ writing in light of the gricean maxims. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2021.2.294.313

Liu, M., Wu, Y., & Lee, J. (2020). Chinese undergraduate EFL learners’ perceptions of plagiarism and use of citations in course papers. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1855769

Mallahi, O. (2024). Exploring the status of argumentative essay writing strategies and problems of Iranian EFL learners. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(19). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00241-1

Mollen, J. (2024). Towards a research ethics of real-world experimentation with emerging technology. Journal of Responsible Technology, 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2024.100098

Olbert, L. (2024). Identifying gaps between research results and education. Journal of Accounting Education, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2023.100884

Osorio, X. D., Koval, V., Hartig, J., & Harsch, C. (2023). Strategic processing of source text in reading-into-writing tasks: A comparison between summary and argumentative tasks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101227

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.

Payant, C., McDonough, K., Uludag, P., & Lindberg, R. (2019). Predicting integrated writing task performance: Source comprehension, prewriting planning, and individual differences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 40, 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.06.001

Saeed, A., Everatt, J., Sadeghi, A., & Munir, A. (2022). Cognitive predictors of coherence in adult esl learners' writing. Journal of Language and Education, 8(3), 106-118. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.12935

Sippel, L., & Martin, I. A. (2024). Is corrective feedback during telecollaboration beneficial? The effects of peer and teacher corrections on L2 writing proficiency. Journal of Second Language Writing, 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101098

Somnuke, P., Punpocha, P., Punikhom, p., Panitrat, R., Nivatpumin, P., Thanakiattiwibun, C., Ramlee, R., Thongkaew, N., & Siriussawakul, A. (2023). Model for enhancing the research conducted by the university medical staff: Participatory action research. Heliyon, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13208

Wragg, E. T., Sara, M. C., Elise, L. L., Catherine, D., & Marie, E. G. (2021). Writing more, better, together: how writing retreats support graduate students through their journey. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1, 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1736272

Yardley, L. (2000). Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health, 15(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440008400302

Yasuda, S. (2023). What does it mean to construct an argument in academic writing? A synthesis of English for general academic purposes and English for specific academic purposes perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101307




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i2.6276

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Fitri Yuliana, Sulis Triyono, Ashadi

Al-Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Abstracted/Indexed by:

    

 


 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.